<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snap Preview shows websites without clicking links!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:36:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary King</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-499</guid>
		<description>It might be a good idea, but still, the script should be as generic as possible. For instance, Google doesn&#039;t extract specific information that it deems important from specific websites, because it&#039;s a generic search engine that shows the generic stuff (page title, URL, etc.) to you instead of showing specific things for specific websites, like news or magazine sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be a good idea, but still, the script should be as generic as possible. For instance, Google doesn&#8217;t extract specific information that it deems important from specific websites, because it&#8217;s a generic search engine that shows the generic stuff (page title, URL, etc.) to you instead of showing specific things for specific websites, like news or magazine sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-498</guid>
		<description>How about extracting the headlines and minus the scrolling for a news magazine site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about extracting the headlines and minus the scrolling for a news magazine site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary King</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Adam,

That wouldn&#039;t work, because how would the script know which text to pull from a website? What if it pulled the navigation bar instead of the content? Then it wouldn&#039;t be useful. Also, scrolling text, or almost anything animated on a web page, that isn&#039;t activated by the user, is not very good aesthetics for a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>That wouldn&#8217;t work, because how would the script know which text to pull from a website? What if it pulled the navigation bar instead of the content? Then it wouldn&#8217;t be useful. Also, scrolling text, or almost anything animated on a web page, that isn&#8217;t activated by the user, is not very good aesthetics for a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>What if they took a sample of the small font from the site and add it on the preview as a scrolling marquee? That could work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if they took a sample of the small font from the site and add it on the preview as a scrolling marquee? That could work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary King</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not Flash; it&#039;s Ajax. Anyways, on certain websites, it would be useful, and on others, not so much. For instance, a website that does a lot of website reviews would maybe find it more useful than a website with a forum, where the text is so tiny that you can&#039;t read it, anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not Flash; it&#8217;s Ajax. Anyways, on certain websites, it would be useful, and on others, not so much. For instance, a website that does a lot of website reviews would maybe find it more useful than a website with a forum, where the text is so tiny that you can&#8217;t read it, anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-494</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a nice bit of flash, but it serves no real purpose. For all practical purposes it&#039;s just an unnecessary nuisance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice bit of flash, but it serves no real purpose. For all practical purposes it&#8217;s just an unnecessary nuisance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary King</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Adam,

Why&#039;d you mention Jerry? Also, that link in my comment IS Google Preview :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>Why&#8217;d you mention Jerry? Also, that link in my comment IS Google Preview <img src='http://www.kinggary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Have you tried Google Preview? A firefox extension, it&#039;s not as comprehensive as the system you describe but it does elaborate on Google  searches. Jerry, can we please not fight on Gary&#039;s blog, you&#039;re being inconsiderate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Google Preview? A firefox extension, it&#8217;s not as comprehensive as the system you describe but it does elaborate on Google  searches. Jerry, can we please not fight on Gary&#8217;s blog, you&#8217;re being inconsiderate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary King</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 05:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Yeah, although I think that if you added anything else to the popups, they&#039;d be pretty bloated already since they look very minimal - and it looks like they have just the right amount of content and used up space in the popup.

Also, if you like this preview feature, you might want to take a look at this as well: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/189/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, although I think that if you added anything else to the popups, they&#8217;d be pretty bloated already since they look very minimal &#8211; and it looks like they have just the right amount of content and used up space in the popup.</p>
<p>Also, if you like this preview feature, you might want to take a look at this as well: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/189/" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/189/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.kinggary.com/archives/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kinggary.com/2006/12/01/snap-preview-shows-websites-without-clicking-links/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>What else could we put in the popups? Maybe website reviews, del.icio.us tags, Google PageRank, or other data? The popups look great and I&#039;d certainly like to have them wherever I browse.

Strategically I think it makes a great Google extension or browser advanced feature. Maybe Google could add it to the Google Toolbar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What else could we put in the popups? Maybe website reviews, del.icio.us tags, Google PageRank, or other data? The popups look great and I&#8217;d certainly like to have them wherever I browse.</p>
<p>Strategically I think it makes a great Google extension or browser advanced feature. Maybe Google could add it to the Google Toolbar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

